Was Thomas Massie’s Election Rigged? Suspicious how Ed Gallrein, who nobody ever heard of doubled turnout from 2024 to 2026 and increased the vote total by 357%, the highest overall vote total in Kentucky history. Plus, Trump wanted Massie punished and removed from congress for voting to have the Epstein files released.

It’s also suspicious how those who crosses Trump gets primaried and remove from congress, such as Representative Al Greene who lost to a primary challenge.

 

Iran Releases Proof Thomas Massie’s Election Was Rigged

 

 

 

Massie increased his turnout by 19% over 2024. Gallrein increased the opposition turnout by 357%! Today’s turnout DOUBLED 2024’s in the highest overall vote total in Kentucky history. Was this really driven by “get out the vote”?

Are we really supposed to believe the Boomers flooded the polls so hard that they overwhelmed every other demographic?Gallrein didn’t do any debates and no grassroots showed up to his campaign events at all. But we’re supposed to believe they came out to vote for him in record numbers? Massie also massively outraised Gallrein in small dollar donations in both totals and number of donors. This is a huge signal for voter enthusiasm. But we’re supposed to believe that Gallrein’s seniors & [fewer small donors] doubled the turnout from 2024

 

 

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯 on X (formerly Twitter): “5/ That’s a crazy small party for a historic record-breaking turnoutpic.twitter.com/xVnAdTkJaq / X”

5/ That’s a crazy small party for a historic record-breaking turnoutpic.twitter.com/xVnAdTkJaq

Small party for a historic record-breaking turnout!

 

Kentucky 2026 Republican Primary CD4 Shows Statistical Anomalies Warranting Investigation

 

Did Trump have Thomas Massie’s Election RIGGED?

 

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅 on X (formerly Twitter): “This is how Israel rigged Thomas Massie’s election in Kentucky and this is exactly how they plan to rig James Fishback’s election in Florida. https://t.co/BiJW7Dm2II pic.twitter.com/7TWzoMCqH2 / X”

This is how Israel rigged Thomas Massie’s election in Kentucky and this is exactly how they plan to rig James Fishback’s election in Florida. https://t.co/BiJW7Dm2II pic.twitter.com/7TWzoMCqH2

This is how Israel rigged Thomas Massie’s election in Kentucky

 

Dr.Sam Youssef Ph.D.,Ph.D.,DPT. on X (formerly Twitter): “⛔️⛔️ Daniel McAdams confirms the Zionist lobby completely stole Thomas Massie’s primary election‼️⛔️He reveals the sudden spike in opposition votes has a statistical probability of basically zero. The establishment is blatantly orchestrating massive election fraud‼️ pic.twitter.com/psUdDZEcuf / X”

⛔️⛔️ Daniel McAdams confirms the Zionist lobby completely stole Thomas Massie’s primary election‼️⛔️He reveals the sudden spike in opposition votes has a statistical probability of basically zero. The establishment is blatantly orchestrating massive election fraud‼️ pic.twitter.com/psUdDZEcuf

Daniel McAdams confirms the Zionist lobby completely stole Thomas Massie’s primary election

He reveals the sudden spike in opposition votes has a statistical probability of basically zero. The establishment is blatantly orchestrating massive election fraud

 

TPV Sean on X (formerly Twitter): “Iran Releases Proof Thomas Massie Election Was Rigged by Israel to Protect Pedophile Blackmail OpAmerican elections are compromised – and now we have the proof. The Iranian hackers who breached Israel’s intelligence servers have dropped receipts that should terrify every voter…. pic.twitter.com/DSq94xwkjN / X”

Iran Releases Proof Thomas Massie Election Was Rigged by Israel to Protect Pedophile Blackmail OpAmerican elections are compromised – and now we have the proof. The Iranian hackers who breached Israel’s intelligence servers have dropped receipts that should terrify every voter…. pic.twitter.com/DSq94xwkjN

Iran Releases Proof Thomas Massie Election Was Rigged by Israel to Protect Pedophile Blackmail Op

American elections are compromised – and now we have the proof. The Iranian hackers who breached Israel’s intelligence servers have dropped receipts that should terrify every voter.

 

 

Election Truth Alliance Identifies Signals of Strong Electoral Fraud

Releases Kentucky Election Forensics Analysis for Rep. Massie v. Gallrein

The Election Truth Alliance (ETA), a team of over 50  cyber security experts, statisticians, and analysts dedicated to election transparency, has released a new analysis of the 2026 Republican primary in Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District. The report highlights statistical anomalies that the ETA believes warrant public oversight and transparent investigations.

The ETA does not allege wrongdoing. Rather, they identify statistically significant patterns in the data that call for merit investigation from election administrators.

 

Key Findings

1. Turnout doubled compared to 2024 — in a non‑Presidential year.
   • Republican participation doubled from 52,593 in 2024 to 105,361 in 2026, despite 2024 being a Presidential cycle. Democratic turnout did not experience a similar increase.
2. District‑level results looked normal; county‑level results did not.
   • The ETA’s heat maps, vote‑share distributions, and Benford‑type tests appear normal when aggregated at the district level. However, the county‑level Klimek et al. (2012) fraud fingerprint calculations show elevated fraud signals for both candidates across nearly all counties. This could indicate intention to mask fraudulent activity.
3. Both candidates’ county‑level fraud fingerprints move in parallel.
   • The ETA’s side‑by‑side county comparison shows Massie and Gallrein’s fingerprint values tracking each other with unusual consistency. ETA analysts note that this pattern persists even after controlling for demographics.
4. Precinct‑size analyses show opposite patterns for the two candidates.
   • The ETA’s precinct‑size (measured as the number of registered Republicans in that precinct) regressions indicate:
     • Massie’s vote share is elevated in the smaller precincts and depressed in the larger precincts.
     • Gallrein’s vote share is depressed in the smaller precincts and elevated in the larger precincts.
   • The ETA describes this as consistent with a fixed vote addition for Massie and a proportional vote addition for both Gallrein and Massie, albeit at different rates.
     • The small fixed-addition of votes (estimated 2 per precinct) would be too small to affect the outcome of the election, but may have served to distort the proportional relationship between the two candidates and avoid detection under standard forensic methods.
     • If proportional votes were added to each candidate, it was at different rates, steadily widening Gallrein’s vote margin relative to Massie as precincts grew larger, potentially influencing the outcome of the election.
5. Voter registration numbers have unexpected predictive power.
   • The ETA’s regression analyses show that voter registration remains a statistically significant predictor of both candidates’ totals even after turnout is fully controlled. Under normal tabulation, registration should not influence final vote totals once actual votes are counted. Instead, this would be consistent with registration having served as a potential input into the calculation of final vote totals.
6. Vote share charts show inconsistent patterns across Election Day vs. mail‑in ballots
   • The ETA’s analysis points to different anomalous patterns operating across different voting methods — with each method appearing unusual in at least one test. These inconsistencies are difficult to attribute to genuine voter behavior in a closed Republican primary after accounting for demographics.

 

The ETA’s Position

The ETA stresses that these findings are not proof of fraud. They are statistical irregularities that merit deeper investigation.

“The combination of clean district‑level results and flagged county‑level fraud signatures suggest that aggregation may be masking underlying patterns,” the ETA writes. “We are calling for transparency via hand recounts.”

What the ETA Is Requesting

The ETA is asking for:

• Election officials to allow a hand count of all paper ballot records from the Kentucky 4th District Republican primary;
• Public, independent oversight of the hand count;
• Transparency around the tabulation processes/ballot chain of custody; and,
• Commitment to elevated security measures to protect against the risk of digital vote manipulation in future elections

The ETA has made its full report available on their website and on Substack; data tables and visualizations are available on their website.

We Dug Into Data for the 2026 Kentucky 4th District Republican Primary

The Deeper Our Analysts Looked, the More Surprising the Findings Became | Preliminary Report

 

Appendices: 2026 Kentucky Republican Primary – Election Truth Alliance

Note: These are appendices to our 2026 Preliminary Analysis of the 2026 Kentucky Republican Primary Election. In order to share the content of our analysis

 

Nathan Taylor, Executive Director of Public Engagement, is available for interviews to discuss the organization’s findings and the broader need for independent election verification. He is a cybersecurity professional and Army veteran.

The organization emphasizes that election certification is not the same as election verification. Certification confirms that procedural steps were followed, whereas verification confirms that the results are accurate. The ETA’s mission is to bridge that gap.

 

https://electiontruthalliance.substack.com/p/lev-remembers-live-were-the-2024 NATHAN TAYLOR WITH LEV PARNAS June 5 2026

Kentucky-based Nathan Taylor from Election Truth Alliance with Jessica Denson: https://www.youtube.com/live/2HQhpS1peUE
Recent Short: https://youtube.com/shorts/naQmSCb6EKo

 

Was the election stolen from Thomas Massie?

You bet it was

 

Dr Beth Clarkson, a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer with a PhD in Statistics, stated she found patterns indicative of manipulation in elections and voting machines; “not just an anomaly that occurred in one place, but a pattern that has occurred repeatedly in elections across the U.S.”

 

Per the above article: NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections

Analysis of recent election data has revealed a worrying pattern of potential fraud. In states where the margin of victory is less than 10%, the same mathematical formula has been found to consistently result in votes being flipped from Democrat to Republican. This has been the case in federal, senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial elections since 2008, and in the 2012 primary contests from other Republicans to Mitt Romney.

The five major voting machine companies have all been found to have close financial ties to the GOP, raising questions of conflict of interest. Tagg Romney, son of the former presidential candidate, has denied any such conflict, despite his investment in Hart Intercivic and Diebold.

A retired NSA analyst has applied a simple formula to election results in Arizona, and found evidence of systemic and coordinated election fraud on a large scale. However, this appears to be limited to larger precincts, as anomalies in smaller precincts are more easily detected.

“Easy to Cheat”

Michael Duniho, a retired NSA analyst, has spent the past seven years investigating voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. His research has focused on a 2006 RTA Bond issue election, which has been subject to much discussion in the media. According to Duniho, “It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, since you can’t see what is going on in the machine.”

Duniho applied a mathematical model to the voting results from the largest precincts in Arizona and found that the Republican candidate in every election since 2008 had gained 8-10% in the polls, while the Democratic candidate had lost 8-10%. This swing of up to 20 points could be enough to swing an election, unless the candidate was already losing badly.

Duniho, with decades of experience in deciphering large amounts of data for the NSA, was determined to understand why this pattern was only occurring in the largest precincts.

Nose Counting

Francois Choquette and James Johnson have uncovered an intriguing phenomenon in the February Republican primary contest in South Carolina. An unusually large number of votes were cast for Mitt Romney in larger precincts, while Paul and Santorum votes trended downward. This prompted Choquette to examine the results in all 50 states, where he found a 10% switch in votes from Democrat to GOP in all states except Utah. Further investigation revealed that Romney had used the same technique against John McCain in Maricopa County in 2008, although McCain’s lead was too large to be affected.

Given the sheer scale of the task, Choquette has provided a set of instructions to enable others to replicate the analysis in their own county or state. The implications of this research could be far-reaching and Choquette’s work is certainly worthy of further examination.

Stealing Votes

Analysis of voting patterns in Arizona has revealed a significant discrepancy between the size of precincts and the results of the election. According to Professor Duniho, if the percentages of votes remained consistent between precincts, the trend line would be flat. However, the reality is that the lines slope downwards for Democrats and upwards for Republicans. This phenomenon is particularly evident in the 2012 Presidential primary, where votes for Rick Santorum and Ron Paul were systematically bled off and credited to Mitt Romney. After Duniho’s spreadsheet was completed, the actual vote totals from other Arizona election contests were compared, further confirming the discrepancy.

Analysis of the 2010 elections in Arizona has revealed evidence of manipulation. From Governor Brewer to Senator McCain and Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, the trends lines all indicated that a single individual had inserted a program into the system’s central computer, flipping votes. The results were astonishing: Governor Brewer had actually lost her election and Gabby Gifford’s slim victory over Tea Party Conservative Jesse Kelly was much greater than the reported 1%.

John Duniho, a political analyst, has called for strong hand count audits to confirm the integrity of the elections. This would involve comparing hand counts to the official reports. Such measures are essential to ensure the legitimacy of the electoral process.

Ohio Precedent

For years, Republicans have been accused of vote tampering in elections. In 2004, the presidential election in Ohio and Florida brought these allegations to the forefront. In Ohio, GOP consultant Michael Connell was accused of creating a computer program with a trap door that shifted Democratic votes to the Republican Party. Connell was subpoenaed as a witness in a lawsuit against then-Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, and lawyers for the plaintiff asked the Department of Justice to provide Connell with security due to two threats made against his life by people associated with Karl Rove. Tragically, Connell was killed in a plane crash before the trial began.

In Florida, the University of California at Berkeley’s Quantitative Methods Research Team conducted a study that found anomalies between Florida counties using touch-screen voting and those using other methods that could not be explained statistically. The study showed that counties using electronic voting resulted in a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. Michael Hout, a Berkeley professor who conducted the study, said that the evidence was too strong to ignore, noting that the probability of such evidence occurring where the true difference is zero is less than once in a thousand chances.

Don’t Trust, Verify

The integrity of the upcoming US election is under scrutiny after an analysis by statistician Richard Duniho found evidence of vote-flipping. This could only be possible if computerized voting machines were programmed to steal votes. Calls to conduct hand counts of ballots by precinct to verify the results have been unsuccessful in Pima County, Arizona, where anomalies were first detected in 2006. With the election just 12 days away, it is unclear whether a judge will be willing to reverse past trends and permit access to ballots.

The implications of this are concerning. More than 100 million Americans will cast their ballots, believing their vote will be fairly counted. If the analysis is correct, criminals could be stealing up to 10% of votes without consequence. This could have a significant impact on the outcome of the election, which is much closer than in 2008 when President Obama won by a large margin. It is essential that the American democratic system is not undermined by another election crisis, raising questions over the last three national Presidential election results.

Don’t Take Our Word

As the US election results continue to pour in, the need for accuracy and transparency has never been greater. In the UK, paper ballots are used and the final outcome can take up to three days to be finalized. This is because every ballot is transparently hand-counted, providing citizens with the assurance that their votes are counted accurately.

The Justice Department’s insistence that results must be reported by 11 pm for the television networks is not only misguided, but irresponsible. It is time for Americans to demand hand ballot counts, and to reject the notion of being victimized by vote fraud. The news that Serbia, Belarus and Kazakhstan are sending election monitors to watch the US election is a stark reminder of the need for accuracy and transparency in this process. It is time for Americans to take control of their own destiny and ensure that their votes are counted accurately.