Trump is like the 6 yr/old Spoiled Brat Monster from the Twilight Zone episode “It’s a Good Life”. If anyone says or does anything he doesn’t like, or if he doesn’t get his way, he wants them destroyed.

This is what the United States has become due to REPUBLICANS who could have Impeached Trump but failed to do so. REPUBLICANS are destroying our country by enabling Trump and never saying NO to any of his lawless or insane actions.

Today’s Twisted, Upside-Down Republican Party… where supporting a lying, lawless, wannabe dictator, lunatic who mental health professionals such as Dr. John Gartner called a ‘Psychiatric Frankenstein monster’, who bragged about grabbing women by the ‘p***y’, who incited Riots and Violence causing 5 deaths by his brainwashed MOB of supporters on J6, who Obstructed Justice on numerous occasions as detailed in the Mueller Report, who Threatened Georgia Election Officials demanding they “find votes” and making sure he’s never held accountable for any of his crimes is “RIGHT”.  Voting to Impeach him for violating his Oath of Office and taking any action to hold him accountable for breaking the law or violating the Constitution is “WRONG”.

Mitt Romney said Republicans didn’t vote to Impeach Trump out of FEAR of Trump and his Supporters. The fact that Republicans did everything possible to put Trump back in the White House after all of his outrageous and lawless conduct PROVE Republicans are Lawless, have no decency, no morals, no shame, no principles, have put party, seizing power, politics & political careers, above all else and are unfit to hold public office.

Republicans such as Marco Rubio who called Trump’s 34 Count Guilty Verdict a ‘complete travesty‘, in 2016 called Trump a ‘Con Artist‘ who’s ‘been exploiting working Americans for 40 years’. Ted Cruz called Trump a ‘Pathological Liar who doesn’t know the difference between truth and lies. He lies practically every word that comes out of his mouth’ & ‘a narcissist at a level I don’t think this country’s ever seen’. Rand Paul; ‘Donald Trump is a delusional narcissist and an orange-faced windbag’ & ‘my concern is that he would grab up that power and treat the country as sort of his bully fiefdom‘. Nikki Haley; ‘Donald Trump is everything I taught my children not to do in kindergarten’. Lindsey Graham; ‘he’s a race-baiting xenophobic religious bigot’ & I think he’s a kook. I think he’s crazy. I think he’s unfit for office’. Kellyanne Conway; ‘he says he’s for the little guy but he’s actually built a lot of his businesses on the backs of the little guy’. Mike Pompeo; ‘Donald Trump the other day said that ‘if he tells a soldier to commit a war crime the soldier will just do it’. Glenn Beck; ‘I don’t think Donald Trump has even read the constitution & knows what’s in the constitution’. Susan Collins; ‘I just cannot support Donald Trump’. Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry called Trump ‘a cancer on conservatism’ and ‘a barking carnival act’. He offers a barking carnival act that can be best described as Trumpism: a toxic mix of demagoguery, mean-spiritedness and nonsense that will lead the Republican Party to perdition if pursued. Let no one be mistaken – Donald Trump’s candidacy is a cancer on conservatism, and it must be clearly diagnosed, excised and discarded.’  According to various news sources, including an article in politico.com, J.D. Vance stated  ‘I’m a Never Trump guy’ , ‘I never liked him’ , ‘My god, what an idiot’ , a ‘cynical asshole like Nixon’ , ‘Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office’  and ‘America’s Hitler’.

Ex-CIA Whistleblower: “The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won”

Math doesn’t lie-people do. A buried NSA‑authorized audit paved the way for this unelected illegitimate regime.

Note: This article has some interesting claims, so we posted some details about it on this site. Please note that the accuracy and validity of this article has not been verified by this site. This is being posted FYI.

Article link; thiswillhold.substack.com/p/ex-cia-whistleblower-the-nsa-audited

Ex-CIA Whistleblower: “The NSA Audited The 2024 Election, Kamala Harris Won”

Math doesn’t lie—people do. A buried NSA‑authorized audit paved the way for this unelected illegitimate regime.

In December 2024, I was personally involved in an NSA‑authorized forensic audit of the 2024 election. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz won—by a wide margin. Trump lost dramatically. There are multiple layers of complexity to this cover‑up, including transnational organized crime syndicates that extend far beyond the United States and our elections. To that point, I work in the human trafficking sector, which intersects with the stolen election(s) and has ties to Trump and Epstein—not to President Biden, Vice President Harris, or Governor Walz, but to the Democrats and other allied interests responsible for burying the audit.” — Adam Zarnowski, ex-CIA agent and author of Jörmungandr

In an exclusive interview, former CIA operative Adam Zarnowski laid out pieces of an intricate network of bad actors and covert operations behind transnational organized crime and the stolen 2024 election. Some of his disclosures confirmed long‑held suspicions; others were shocking, exposing connections between organized crime, political operatives, and global power brokers.

Adam’s testimony paints one of the clearest—and most disturbing—pictures yet of how the cover‑up was orchestrated and why it has remained buried. His free book Jörmungandr expounds on this testimony, making these intricate networks impossible to ignore.

He explained that none of his revelations are classified; he has full authorization to speak and is prepared to testify under oath. Having personally assisted the NSA in collecting the data, he stressed that a full forensic hand‑count of the 2024 election—beginning with Representative Victoria Spartz—must be this country’s top priority. The completed NSA audit results have been submitted, yet so far have been met with silence.

That silence isn’t just political inertia—it’s cover for how the 2024 election was subverted. At the center is the machinery itself: illegally copied software, decades of ES&S vulnerabilities, and the installation of a back door through a last‑minute change order right before the election.

ECO 1188: The Unlocked Backdoor

In September 2024, ES&S quietly pushed a change into its certified election software: ECO 1188. Pro V&V rubber‑stamped it. The EAC signed off. This change alone isn’t the whole issue—rather it’s just one piece of a much larger, compromised puzzle that’s been taking shape in plain sight for decades.

On paper, it was filed as a “de minimis” update — a minor tweak that wouldn’t require deep review.
In reality, it moved a critical file (config.ini) from the static hash list to the dynamic hash list inside ES&S’s Electionware software.

For anyone who doesn’t speak vendor-euphemism, here’s what that means:

• Certified voting software normally has cryptographic hashes — a kind of digital fingerprint — for every file.
• If even a single character in a protected file changes, the hash doesn’t match, and the system throws an error.
• ECO 1188 told the software: Don’t check this file anymore.

The config.ini file isn’t trivial. It controls how Electionware generates and formats vote totals for reports—the very outputs that are read on election night. By moving it to the “dynamic” list in September 2024, ES&S, Pro V&V and the EAC created a window where reporting behavior could be altered without triggering any security warning within EVS 6.5.0.0, approved for use in July 2024—coming soon to an election booth near you.

If that sounds reckless, it’s because it is. And it’s not as if we weren’t warned. Princeton’s Andrew Appel and Susan Greenhalgh have been sounding the alarm for years that vendor‑controlled hash systems are little more than security theater—especially when vendors can exclude or reclassify files at will. This isn’t their first, second, or even third rodeo—we highly recommend reading their findings in this CITP Blog.

To understand how we reached a point where a president who lost an election can illegally breach voting equipment, maliciously copy the software, and leave that same equipment in service; where tech oligarchs with a vested interest in the election’s outcome can partner with a company that has access to 70% of U.S. voting machines; and where a private vendor with a long, checkered history can slip in last‑minute backdoor access right before a presidential election—we have to rewind, all the way back to the year 2000.

Read the full article at – thiswillhold.substack.com/p/ex-cia-whistleblower-the-nsa-audited

The Machines Were Changed Before the 2024 Election. No One Was Told.

A private lab quietly altered voting machines used across the U.S. Then it vanished.

Per the above article:

“The Machines Were Changed Before the 2024 Election. No One Was Told”

A private lab quietly altered voting machines used across the U.S. Then it vanished.

Note: This article has some interesting claims, so we posted some details about it on this site. Please note that the accuracy and validity of this article has not been verified by this site. This is being posted FYI.

Article link: https://dissentinbloom.substack.com/p/the-machines-were-changed-before)

Dissent in Bloom

In the leafy suburbs of Rockland County, New York, democracy tripped on a loose wire and hit its head. What started as a small lawsuit over a few missing votes may be unraveling into one of the most damning election integrity scandals in years.

At the center of it all: missing votes, statistical anomalies, and a federally accredited testing lab called Pro V&V.
In 2024, voters in Rockland County, NY, filed sworn legal affidavits claiming they had voted for independent Senate candidate Diane Sare. But the machines told a different story. In one district, nine people said they voted for her. The machines recorded five. In another, five claimed to vote for her but only three were officially counted by the machines.

At the same time, In districts where voters clearly favored Democrats (evident by strong support for democratic Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand) Kamala Harris’s name either underperformed or seemed to disappear from the top of the ballot completely. They’d found that in some of the counties people where voted overwhelmingly for the Democratic candidate Kirsten, Kamala Harris somehow got no votes at all.

(Correction): Trump outperformed Republican Senate candidates by 2.1 million votes nationwide. In 33 states, over 750k more people voted for president than Senate, a drop-off that might be normal, or might mean votes vanished before they were counted. That data shows over 2.1 million people voted for him & skipped the rest of the Republicans on the same ballot?

My opinion? That kind of pattern doesn’t scream voter preference. It whispers something went wrong in the vote count itself.

That’s not split-ticket voting. That’s a mathematical anomaly.

SMART Elections, a nonpartisan watchdog group, uncovered serious discrepancies in New York, including a reported drop-off of over 314,000 votes between presidential and Senate contests, and filed suit. and filed a lawsuit. And on May 22, 2025, Judge Rachel Tanguay agreed: the allegations were serious enough to warrant discovery. The lawsuit, SMART Legislation et al. v. Rockland County Board of Elections, moves forward, with a hearing scheduled for September 22, 2025.

The Silent Middleman

Between March and September 2024, Pro V&V signed off on a series of hardware and software updates to ES&S voting machines. These updates were all waved through under the label “de minimis,” a technicality supposedly meant for small, insignificant tweaks. Replacing a cable. That kind of thing.

In 2024, Pro V&V and the EAC quietly approved significant changes to voting systems, including new hardware components, software updates, and a revamped Electionware reporting module. These weren’t minor tweaks. They touched ballot scanners, modified audit files, and even affected machines flagged by CISA. But by calling them “de minimis,” they avoided full testing, public scrutiny, and transparency.

These changes? I do not believe they qualify as “minimum” and the rules generally do not allow this. Software changes are not supposed to be considered minor. But Pro V&V Since they were filed as de minimis they were not subject to any independent external oversight, testing, and lacked any public-facing explanation.

These programs need more oversight. If the system can be changed in the shadows, marked simply as “DeMinimis” without any actual testing, even something as small as hardware, then every vote cast on those machines was at risk of miscount or manipulation.

The ES&S systems that received these shadow approvals are used in over 40% of U.S. counties. Pennsylvania, Florida, New Jersey, California, all rely on machines that Pro V&V signs off on. The ExpressVote XL, implicated in the Sare vote discrepancy (missing votes) is already being used in battleground states.

Even worse? There’s no independent watchdog in this process. No backup. No outside review. Two private companies (V&V & SLI Compliance) get to decide whether our national voting infrastructure is safe and they get to make that call in secret. What we’re left with isn’t quality assurance. It’s a rubber stamp masquerading as a security check.

PROV&V? The private company certified to change our voting system? Their website, once home to testing logs, certification documents, and contact information, collapsed into a hollow shell shortly after the 2024 elections.

As of June 2025, is still just a single barren page. One phone number. One generic email.

This is the lab responsible for certifying the very machines that count our votes. No one’s checking their math. No one’s checking their judgment. And when the heat turns up, right around the 2024 elections, they vanished from public view. A private company, backed by federal accreditation, with the power to alter national election infrastructure is operating in total darkness.

Behind this fog stands Jack Cobb, the elusive director of Pro V&V. He’s never run for office, never faced public questioning, and yet every major voting machine must pass through his private lab before it reaches a ballot box.

He is the unelected gatekeeper of election infrastructure, a man accountable to no one but his clients and the architecture that shelters him.

 

A Fatal Flaw In Our Voting System

Federal law all but guarantees labs like Pro V&V stay in power. Under the Help America Vote Act (2002), they’re accredited by the Election Assistance Committee (EAC) in conjunction with National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). But once a lab is in, it stays in.

There’s no built-in decertification path. No process for public challenge. Not even a hotline to flag concerns. So Cobb and his team continue operating under a veil of technical legitimacy, certifying changes to voting machines from inside a sealed chamber where no one can see what’s really going on.
The EAC is the federal agency that approves which voting systems can be used, while NIST helps write the technical rules those systems must follow. Together, they decide which labs get to test and certify the machines that count our votes.

They approve the labs, set the certification process, and are supposed to enforce standards. Nominations come from party leadership in Congress. So the President technically picks from a short list provided by House and Senate leaders.

Two of the four EAC commissioners were placed by Donald Trump during his first presidency: Benjamin W. Hovland & Donald L. Palmer.
So, this means, even if these companies commit blatant fraud, the federal rules offer no clear pathway to remove them. The EAC themselves has no teeth to revoke accreditation unless there’s proof of total failure or criminal wrongdoing and even then, the process is vague, bureaucratic, and opaque.

To remove a lab like Pro V&V, EAC has to first document “significant evidence” of noncompliance or misconduct. But the kicker is, they don’t have real-time oversight. There’s no routine audit. So unless someone files a formal complaint, and the EAC chooses to act, nothing moves.

If they do decide to investigate, they conduct an internal review: think paperwork, interviews, more paperwork. Then the EAC would have to initiate a formal vote to suspend or revoke the lab’s accreditation. That process can drag on for months, and there’s no public hearing requirement, no outside watchdog, and no clear timeline.
So, this means Cobb and his team continue operating under a cloak of legitimacy, quietly certifying election-altering changes while shielded by federal inertia & structural silence.

Now, knowing this I want you to remember:

Just when scrutiny was needed most, Pro V&V’s online presence vanished. Watchdogs looking for documentation found an empty shell. For months, there were no posted reports, no visible activity. The lab that certifies machines for national elections essentially evaporated from the internet.

And no one in federal government has intervened. Not the EAC. Not NIST. Not Congress.

So What’s Next?

This lawsuit won’t undo the 2024 election. That chapter is closed. Congress certified the results, and the machinery of power has already shifted into its next gear. But if what SMART Elections is uncovering turns out to be true, it could set off a political earthquake. Legal challenges. Demands to decertify voting systems. State-level probes. Mounting pressure on the EAC to finally do its job.

This wasn’t just a glitch in some sleepy county. It was a stress test of our entire system and possibly nation wide system fraud in the presidential election. And the real tragedy? Almost no one noticed.

(end of quote from dissentinbloom.substack)

She Won. They Didn’t Just Change the Machines. They Rewired the Election.

How Leonard Leo’s 2021 sale of an electronics firm enabled tech giants to subvert the 2024 election.

Note: This article has some interesting claims, so we posted some details about it on this site. Please note that the accuracy and validity of this article has not been verified by this site. This is being posted FYI.

Article link: https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-they-didnt-just-change-the

She Won. They Didn’t Just Change the Machines. They Rewired the Election

How Leonard Leo’s 2021 sale of an electronics firm enabled tech giants to subvert the 2024 election

(the following is from the above report by thiswillhold.substack)

The Dark Enlightenment Coup

The missing votes uncovered in Smart Elections’ legal case in Rockland County, New York, are just the tip of the iceberg—an iceberg that extends across the swing states and into Texas.

On Monday, an investigator’s story  finally hit the news cycle: Pro V&V, one of only two federally accredited testing labs, approved sweeping last-minute updates to ES&S voting machines in the months leading up to the 2024 election—without independent testing, public disclosure, or full certification review.

These changes were labeled “de minimis”—a term meant for trivial tweaks. But they touched ballot scanners, altered reporting software, and modified audit files—yet were all rubber-stamped with no oversight.

That revelation is a shock to the public. But for those who’ve been digging into the bizarre election data since November, this isn’t the headline—it’s the final piece to the puzzle. While Pro V&V was quietly updating equipment in plain sight, a parallel operation was unfolding behind the curtain—between tech giants and Donald Trump.

And it started with a long forgotten sale.

A Power Cord Becomes a Backdoor

In March 2021, Leonard Leo—the judicial kingmaker behind the modern conservative legal machine—sold a quiet Chicago company by the name of Tripp Lite for $1.65 billion. The buyer: Eaton Corporation, a global power infrastructure conglomerate that just happened to have a partnership with Peter Thiel’s Palantir.

To most, Tripp Lite was just a hardware brand—battery backups, surge protectors, power strips. But in America’s elections, Tripp Lite devices were something else entirely.

They are physically connected to ES&S central tabulators and Electionware servers, and Dominion tabulators and central servers across the country. And they aren’t dumb devices. They are smart UPS units—programmable, updatable, and capable of communicating directly with the election system via USB, serial port, or Ethernet.

ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S’s Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.

If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environment—without ever modifying certified election software.

In Dominion’s Democracy Suite 5.17, the drivers for these UPS units are listed as “optional”—meaning they can be updated remotely without triggering certification requirements or oversight. Optional means unregulated. Unregulated means invisible. And invisible means perfect for infiltration.

A New Purpose for the Partnership

After the Tripp Lite acquisition, Eaton stayed under the radar. But in May 2024, it resurfaced with an announcement that escaped most headlines: Eaton was deepening its partnership with Palantir Technologies.

Let’s be clear, Palantir wasn’t brought in for customer service. It was brought in to do what it does best: manage, shape, and secure vast streams of data—quietly. According to Eaton’s own release, Palantir’s role would include:
– AI-driven oversight of connected infrastructure
– Automated analysis of large datasets
– And—most critically—“secure erasure of digital footprints”

The Digital Janitor: also known as forensic sanitization, it was now being embedded into Eaton-managed hardware connected directly to voting systems. Palantir didn’t change the votes. It helped ensure you’d never prove it if someone else did.

BallotProof: The Front-End for Scrubbing Democracy

Enter the ballot scrubbing platform BallotProof. Co-created by Ethan Shaotran, a longtime employee of Elon Musk and current DOGE employee, BallotProof was pitched as a transparency solution—an app to “verify” scanned ballot images and support election integrity.

With Palantir’s AI controlling the backend, and BallotProof cleaning the front, only one thing was missing: the signal to go live.

September 2024: Eaton and Musk Make It Official

Then came the final public breadcrumb:
In September 2024, Eaton formally partnered with Elon Musk.
The stated purpose? A vague, forward-looking collaboration focused on “grid resilience” and “next-generation communications.”
But buried in the partnership documents was this line:

“Exploring integration with Starlink’s emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity.”

The Activation: Starlink Goes Direct-to-Cell

That signal came on October 30, 2024—just days before the election, Musk activated 265 brand new low Earth orbit (LEO) V2 Mini satellites, each equipped with Direct-to-Cell (DTC) technology capable of processing, routing, and manipulating real-time data, including voting data, through his satellite network.

DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.

From that moment on:
– Commands could be sent from orbit
– Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
– Compromised devices could be triggered remotely

This groundbreaking project that should have taken two-plus years to build, was completed in just under ten months.

Elon Musk boasts endlessly about everything he’s launching, building, buying—or even just thinking about—whether it’s real or not. But he pulls off one of the largest and fastest technological feats in modern day history… and says nothing? One might think that was kind of… “weird.”

Lasers From Space

According to New York Times reporting, on October 5—just before Starlink’s DTC activation—Musk texted a confidant:

“I’m feeling more optimistic after tonight. Tomorrow we unleash the anomaly in the matrix.”

Then, an hour later:

“This isn’t something on the chessboard, so they’ll be quite surprised. ‘Lasers’ from space.”

It read like a riddle. In hindsight, it was a blueprint.

Let’s review what was in place:

This wasn’t a theory. It was a full-scale operation. A systemic digital occupation—clean, credentialed, and remote-controlled.

The Outcome

Data that makes no statistical sense. A clean sweep in all seven swing states.
The fall of the Blue Wall. Eighty-eight counties flipped red—not one flipped blue.
Every victory landed just under the threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Donald Trump outperformed expectations in down-ballot races with margins never before seen—while Kamala Harris simultaneously underperformed in those exact same areas.

If one were to accept these results at face value—Donald Trump, a 34-count convicted felon, supposedly outperformed Ronald Reagan. According to the co-founder of the Election Truth Alliance:

“These anomalies didn’t happen nationwide. They didn’t even happen across all voting methods—this just doesn’t reflect human voting behavior.”

They were concentrated.
Targeted.
Specific to swing states and Texas—and specific to Election Day voting.

And the supposed explanation? “Her policies were unpopular.”

Let’s think this through logically. We’re supposed to believe that in all the battleground states, Democratic voters were so disillusioned by Vice President Harris’s platform that they voted blue down ballot—but flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket?

Not in early voting.
Not by mail.
With exception to Nevada, only on Election Day.
And only after a certain threshold of ballots had been cast—where VP Harris’s numbers begin to diverge from her own party, and Trump’s suddenly begin to surge. As President Biden would say, “C’mon, man.”

In the world of election data analysis, there’s a term for that: vote-flipping algorithm.

Billionaires and Tech Giants Pulled Off the Crime of the Century

Why? There wasn’t just one reason—there were many.

Elon Musk himself hinted at the stakes: he faced the real possibility of a prison sentence if Trump lost. He launched his bid for Twitter—at $20 billion over market value—just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag. But when the ROI is $15 trillion in mineral rights tied to Ukraine losing the war and geopolitical deals Trump could green light, it wasn’t a loss—it was leverage.

It’s no secret Musk was in communication with Putin for over two years. He even granted Starlink access to Russian forces. That’s not just profiteering. That’s treason.

Then there’s Peter Thiel and the so-called “broligarchs”—tech billionaires who worship at the altar of shower-avoidant blogger Curtis Yarvin. They casually joke about “humane genocide for non-producers” and have long viewed democracy as a nuisance—an obstacle to their vision of hypercapitalism and themselves as the permanent ruling elite.

Well, what is the elimination of Medicaid if not “humane genocide”—and does anyone really wonder why his 40-year-old protégé and political rookie, JD Vance, is Vice President? With this technology in place, if the third-term legislation were to pass, it would hand Vance a minimum of twelve years at the helm of Thiel’s regime.

And of course, Donald Trump himself:  He spent a year telling his followers he didn’t need their votes—at one point stating,

“…in four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.”

 

Trump was facing eighty-eight felony indictments—he was desperate to avoid conviction and locked in a decades-long alliance with Vladimir Putin. An alliance that’s now impossible to ignore—look no further than his policy trail.

He froze aid to Ukraine and has threatened to place sanctions on them, while planning to lift sanctions off Russia. He openly campaigned for anti-EU candidates, and sided with Russia in multiple key United Nations votes related to the Ukraine conflict.

Let’s be clear:
Donald Trump pledges allegiance to a red, white, and blue flag—
It’s just not the American one.

What Happens Now?

We don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We need courage. While state attorneys general begin their investigations, it only takes one U.S. senator to initiate the disqualification proceedings against the unelected and unfit occupant of the Oval Office.

State Attorneys General and Investigators:
– Conduct independent audits of UPS firmware on Dominion and ES&S machines
– Subpoena communications between Eaton, Palantir, Starlink employees, and Pro V&V
– Audit Starlink satellite logs for the week of the election
– Freeze uncertified infrastructure updates
– Recount physical ballots—by hand

Now they’re rolling out the same technological toolkit abroad—forcing countries into Starlink contracts in exchange for tariff relief.

The U.S. election wasn’t their endgame. It was their litmus test.

(end quote from thiswillhold.substack)

She Won. They Didn’t Just Change the Machines. They Rewired the Election.

How Leonard Leo’s 2021 sale of an electronics firm enabled tech giants to subvert the 2024 election.

She Won, Part II: Seven Judges. Direct-to-Cell Satellites. A Hijacked Election.

How the Federalist Society’s judicial pipeline and a new network of 265 low-Earth orbit DTC satellites cleared the runway for Trump’s return to power.

NOTE: This article has been getting attention and is being shared on Social Media, so we posted some details about it on this site. Please note that the accuracy and validity of this article has not been verified by this site. This is being posted FYI.

Article link; https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-part-ii-seven-judges-direct

Jun 15, 2025

That’s One Expensive Bird, Mr. Musk

There’s no question Elon Musk is a headline-maker—but in April 2022, he was making headlines for a very specific reason. One that should have raised eyebrows for anyone paying attention. Seemingly out of nowhere, Musk made an unsolicited offer to purchase Twitter for $44 billion—$20 billion over its market value.

Most dismissed it as just another billionaire flex—but the timing told a different story: his bid came just 49 days after Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine. That was the first red flag. What followed wasn’t a red wave—it was a red carpet.

Over the next two years, a path was cleared, systems were compromised, and Trump was repositioned—not through public mandate, but through a strategic judicial firewall crafted by a powerful faction within the Federalist Society and reinforced by a coordinated campaign of technological manipulation.

We’ve already broken down the digital and satellite infrastructure. Now, we’re stepping inside the courtrooms—and following the judges—who strategically removed all accountability hurdles between Trump and the White House.

The Nuclear Option: Judicial Engineering by Design

The term “nuclear option” sounds dramatic, but what unfolded was exactly that: a procedural detonation that reshaped the U.S. judiciary—and cleared the runway for Donald Trump’s legal invincibility. In 2017, Mitch McConnell pulled the nuclear trigger for Supreme Court confirmations. Facing a filibuster on Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch, McConnell changed the rules to force him through with just 51 votes.

What followed was a full-on Federalist Society takeover of the federal judiciary:

• 3 Supreme Court justices: Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett
• Over 200 lower court judges, all fast-tracked under the new simple-majority rules

Let’s just say: McConnell caught the car—which turned out to be a MAGA bus barreling straight toward the Constitution. And no, his idol Ronald Reagan wouldn’t be pleased—at this trajectory, our children will soon be learning Russian.

Your Seat Awaits, Judge Cannon

Just seven days after Trump lost the 2020 election to President Joe Biden, the Senate rammed through Judge Aileen Cannon—a Federalist Society loyalist—to the federal bench, again via the nuclear option. The seat? It would later oversee Trump’s classified documents case.

Think about that. Before he even walked out of the White House with stolen materials and a failed insurrection attempt, Donald Trump had already secured the judge who would protect him. He wasn’t just breaking the law—he was fortifying his legal escape route in advance, with an assist from Senate Republicans.

By mid-2022, Judge Cannon was the only active judge in Florida’s Fort Pierce division. Trump’s legal team took full advantage, filing his case in person—in violation of standard protocol—which all but guaranteed it would land on her desk. That week, Cannon was assigned 9 of 29 new cases—over 30%, nearly triple the norm. Despite calls for recusal, she refused. She stayed. And she stalled.

Five States, Five Illegal Breaches

Trump’s allies—under the guise of investigating voter fraud—illegally breached election equipment in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Colorado. What should have been a five-alarm fire in American democracy was instead buried beneath strategic delays, bureaucratic filings, and a crowded judicial calendar.
Eighty-eight felonies, so little time.

• In Fulton County, Pennsylvania, machines were taken out of secure facilities and transported to offsite locations for unauthorized “inspections.”

• In Mesa County, Colorado, election clerk Tina Peters disabled surveillance and granted full access to operatives who compromised the system for months. She was later sentenced to nine years in prison.
• In Michigan, attorneys connected to Trump physically removed tabulators and took them to hotels and Airbnbs for off-site analysis—resulting in felony charges.

These weren’t one-off breaches—they were part of a coordinated, multi-state campaign with access lasting weeks or even months, in some cases extending through the 2021 election cycle.

Judicial Gymnastics in Georgia

Smile! We could ask Governor Kemp how his poll workers got the backdoor codes to the voting equipment for their t-shirts—but we already know the answer. In early January 2021, lawyers aligned with Sidney Powell—accompanied by fake “electors”—gained illegal access to the Coffee County elections office, where they copied data from Dominion voting machines and servers. Although the equipment itself wasn’t removed, the top-secret software was later transferred to off-site locations, including hotels. That’s when Fulton County DA Fani Willis stepped in, filing charges on behalf of the people.

In 2023, DA Fani Willis’s case against Trump was gaining traction—until January 2024, when Trump co-defendant Michael Roman filed a motion claiming Willis had a conflict of interest. The issue? She had a romantic relationship with a fellow prosecutor on the case.

That’s right: two people on the same side of the courtroom, working toward the same legal objective, were… dating. Pardon me while I dig for my pearls.

There was no evidence of case compromise, no mishandled materials, no ethical breach impacting the charges—just the appearance of impropriety, according to Trump’s attorneys. Rich, coming from a man convicted of falsifying records to cover up hush money payments to a lady of the evening. Apparently, what really undermines democracy are lunch tabs and the thread count at the Napa DoubleTree.

The case survived the initial challenge but was quickly appealed. That’s when Federalist Society-member Judge Elizabeth Gobeil stepped in at the Georgia Court of Appeals and delivered exactly what Trump needed: a ruling that DA Willis’s personal relationship—and her decision to occasionally cover meals or travel expenses—was reason enough to disqualify her—and her entire office—from the case.

Had this case not been thrown into legal purgatory, the entire country would know that in 2020 and 2021, Trump’s associates used the ‘Big Lie’ to illegally breach voting equipment in five states. He’d be living the life he deserves—three hots and a cot—and we’d be sipping mimosas on patios instead of marching in the streets for No Kings Day protests.

All ‘Heil’ King Trump

Then came the big one.

Not that it was a surprise—after stalling the ruling until the absolute last minute on their calendar, in the summer of 2024, Trump was gifted immunity by a 6–3 ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court. Five of the six justices in the majority were Federalist Society members.

The Court didn’t just look the other way—it rewrote the Constitution from the bench. They call it “Leo’s Court” for a reason. Leonard Leo and Mitch McConnell’s 2017 judicial takeover was reshaping the republic—one ruling at a time.

Shortly thereafter, on an opinion gone rogue—complete with a love note and a wink from her SCOTUS daddy Clarence Thomas—Judge Aileen Cannon, after months of stalling the documents case, tossed it altogether. Because naturally, stealing classified documents from the National Archives, lying about having them, then refusing to return them—until the FBI had to raid your house—is an official duty for a president, right?

Seven judges—all Federalist Society members—systematically dismantled every legal obstacle between Donald Trump and the Oval Office. They didn’t rule on cases; they eliminated them. They didn’t just set the table—they handed him the crown.

“Lasers From Space”

Let’s not forget what we covered in Part One.

• In 2021, Leonard Leo sold Tripp Lite—a company responsible for powering over 70% of U.S. voting equipment—to Eaton Corporation.
• Eaton Corporation was already partnered with Peter Thiel and Palantir.
• By September 2024, Eaton announced a new partnership with Elon Musk, just weeks before the election.

Buried in that partnership agreement was this line:
“Exploring integration with Starlink’s emerging low-orbit DTC infrastructure for secure operational continuity.”

What does that mean in plain English?
Election infrastructure and Musk’s newly launched low-Earth orbit DTC satellites were on a collision course—and no one was regulating the outcome. This technology wipes out the “air-gapped” defense altogether—because with Eaton in the picture, these systems can bypass it entirely.

Brass Tacks

Give it to us straight, Mr. Bean—a clean sweep in all seven swing states. The fall of the Blue Wall. Eighty-eight counties flipped red—not one flipped blue. Ronald Reagan would like a word. Every supposed victory landed just under the threshold to trigger an automatic recount. And statistically absurd data that left Dr. Walter Mebane and the Election Truth Alliance statisticians scratching their heads and burning the midnight oil.

They blew it out—think Revenge of the Nerds: Villains Version. Almost like a pack of young hackers threw out the Ric Flair “WOOOO” and slammed the Go Big or Go Home button.

From the courtroom to orbit, this wasn’t a campaign—it was a coordinated operation that fused judicial engineering, backdoor breaches, hardware infiltration, and satellite deployment. The outcome? Data so manipulated, it makes the Russian tail look like a nub.

And the part no one seems willing to confront is the through line—from the front-end stacking of courts, to the sale of Tripp Lite to a company already partnered with Palantir, to their subsequent handshake with Elon Musk just weeks before the election.

Now, I’m not a state attorney general—but if I were, I’d be inviting folks down to the office for a cuppa joe and a conversation under oath. Because what we’re looking at is, quite clearly, a four-year coordinated strategy to return Donald Trump to the Oval Office—whether he won the 2024 election or not.

“Concerning.”

She Won, Part III: The Devil Is In The Data

88 counties flipped red. None flipped blue. Trump swept every swing state-each just above the mandatory recount thresholds. What are the odds? About one in never.

She Won, Part III: The Devil Is In The Data

88 counties flipped red. None flipped blue. Trump swept every swing state—each just above the mandatory recount thresholds. What are the odds? About one in never.

Note: This article has some interesting claims, so we posted some details about it on this site. Please note that the accuracy and validity of this article has not been verified by this site. This is being posted FYI.

Article link; https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-part-iii-the-devil-is-in

This Will Hold

Jun 19, 2025

Darkness Our Old Friend

Watching the results roll in on election night, we can probably all agree—our collective gut was telling us something was just… off. Kornacki wasn’t nacki-ing, the blue wave never appeared, and a familiar dread—reminiscent of 2016—began to creep in. But this time was different. This time, we knew.

Because between 2020 and 2021, Trump’s allies illegally breached voting equipment in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Colorado, and Arizona. That voting equipment is still in use, and thanks to a Federalist Society-led appeals court in Georgia, “Teflon Don” got away with breaking the law—again.

At 9:32 p.m. on November 5, Elon Musk preemptively declared victory with a cryptic tweet: “Game, set, match.” Thirty minutes later, Ted Cruz’s smug face squatted on the nation’s screens like he was claiming a throne. Many went to bed discouraged that night. But some of us? We went to bed determined.

Because if you’ve never been to Texas, let’s get one thing straight: everyone hates Ted Cruz.

So, we got to work.

When The Math Ain’t Mathing

We struggled to understand how a 34-count convicted felon—who couldn’t fill a stadium and doesn’t know that asylum is a homonym—somehow outperformed Reagan, flipping 88 counties red while not a single one flipped blue. It felt improbable. So, we did what anyone would do in the face of statistical absurdity: we started digging and ran the numbers.

And before any data purists get their knickers in a twist:
No, it’s not a coin flip.
No, we can’t apply strict binomial math.
We get it.

In fact, based on 2020 data, the actual probability is even worse.

But to be generous—and to keep the math conservative—let’s assume each of the 88 counties had a simple 50/50 chance of flipping red or blue. And yet, somehow, all of them flipped red. Not a single one went blue.

Math:

That’s about a 1 in 1 octillion chance of occurring naturally. This is why statisticians have been running around in hair-on-fire mode for the last six months.

But wait—it gets worse.

Another Crack In The Liberty Bell

The data above reflects what’s commonly referred to as the “drop-off”—the difference between the number of votes cast for the presidential race and those cast for the next down-ballot race within the same party.

In mail-in voting, Harris and Trump show similar drop-off rates (1.48% vs. 1.96%), which aligns with expected voter behavior. But on Election Day, the numbers diverge sharply: Trump’s drop-off rate skyrockets to 4.51%, while Harris’ plummets to 0.87%.

That kind of disparity is impossible to ignore. According to this data—on Election Day only—voters selected Democrats down-ballot, then flipped to Trump at the top of the ticket.

This pattern isn’t just unusual—it defies logic and human voting behavior. It’s the kind of anomaly that should sound every alarm.

But don’t take the ETA’s word for it—the foremost expert in election forensics, Dr. Walter Mebane, backed it up. His eforensics model estimated that 225,440 votes in the Pennsylvania presidential race were possibly fraudulent. Of those, 111,088 were identified with high confidence as intentional, malevolent manipulations.

And that’s just the data. It doesn’t even include the tens of thousands of voters still reporting their ballots as unaccounted for.

Step 1: It’s A Sweep

Under our previously generous 50/50 assumptions, what are the odds of a candidate winning all seven swing states?

More math:

So even with idealized conditions, this kind of a sweep is already rare.

Let’s take it a step further:
What are the odds that a candidate wins all seven swing states and comes in just above the recount threshold in every single one?

Step 2: Seven Swing States Above Recount Threshold

Based on historical trends, competitive elections have about a 3% chance of landing within the margin required for a recount. The odds of that happening in all seven states?

More math: This alone is not suspicious, but when layered with the probability of sweeping all seven swing states, the scenario becomes even more rare.

Even more math: And again—for the statisticians already heading to the comments—we know this isn’t how electoral modeling works in real life.

This is a simplified, extremely generous baseline meant to illustrate how implausible the official outcome is, even under favorable assumptions.

And as you’ve probably guessed by now… It gets worse.

HOW could it get worse? Because when you combine the probability of all three—the 88 counties flipping red (with none flipping blue) and the sweep of all seven swing states, each one landing just above the threshold for an automatic recount—you’re no longer talking about a statistical outlier.

You’re talking about a Fairy Godmother.
Or, more likely, a Space Godfather.

Step 3: Combined Probability of All Three
We promise, this is the final math you’ll have to look at:

This equation puts the odds at roughly 1 in 50 octillion

Yes, you read that right. That’s a 1 in 5×10²⁸ chance—a 1 followed by 28 zeroes:

1 in 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

The chances of a candidate flipping all 88 counties red and winning all 7 swing states just above the mandatory recount thresholds? So minuscule, it rounds down to zero—at least in any world governed by math and not “magic.”

Trump spent most of 2024 telling his dwindling crowds that he didn’t “need” their votes:

“I’m being told I already have all the votes I need,” he bragged. “My beautiful Christians… just vote this one time… it’ll be fixed so good… you’ll never have to vote again.” Then came his praise for Elon Musk’s expertise with those “vote-counting computers.”

Now, Trump is claiming he’ll sweep the 2026 midterms:

“Blue states will totally disappear from the map,” he’s promising a “big, big surprise.” It’s probably fair to say that for must of us, we already experienced this so-called “surprise.”

And in our collective, gut we know it.

What You Can Do

The Rockland County, NY case is just the tip of an iceberg that stretches across the swing states and Texas.
We have constitutional avenues to remove this entire illegitimate administration—but the American people have to know the truth about what happened on November 5 to compel the “right people” to act.

Key Action: Pennsylvania

The Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has the statutory authority to take action against election fraud or manipulation.
Sign the petition sponsored by the Election Truth Alliance, demanding a paper ballot audit in PA.

How Else You Can Help

• Normalize the truth:Share the data. Talk about the first two articles. Talk about all of it. Because as we’ve learned, “They’re not like us…”
• Contact members of Congress and state attorneys general:
  Voice your concerns about the statistically improbable results of the 2024 election.
• Start a correspondence campaign:
  Call, email, and post on social media to urge PA officials to proceed with a paper ballot audit.

Hold on to your hope. Because again—we don’t need permission to enforce the Constitution. We just need courage.

Trump says he holds all the Levers of power to overturn Election Results

Trump Already Trying To STEAL The Next Election

Trump’s SCHEME to RIG the Next Election – Greg Palast

Independent journalist Zeynab Day interviews investigative journalist Greg Palast about Trump’s new executive order that implements severe voter ID restrictions meant to suppress votes that traditionally go to the Democratic Party.

Trump threatens to take over NYC if Mamdani is elected mayor

‘I hold all the levers’: Trump hints he’ll overturn election result in NYC

President Donald Trump vowed to be the savior of New York City as he declared war on the Democratic Party’s nominee for mayor – a man who won overwhelming support from primary voters in a democratic election.With no evidence, Trump declared Zohran Mamdani a “Communist Lunatic” and told the city to r…

Per the above article: ‘I hold all the levers’: Trump hints he’ll overturn election result in NYC

Trump vowed to be the savior of New York City as he declared war on the Democratic Party’s nominee for mayor — a man who won overwhelming support from primary voters in a democratic election. “As President of the United States, I’m not going to let this Communist Lunatic destroy New York,” Trump raged on Truth Social Wednesday. “Rest assured, I hold all the levers, and have all the cards. I’ll save New York City, and make it “Hot” and “Great” again, just like I did with the Good Ol’ USA!”

DOJ Defends Voter Suppression, Trump Targets NYC Mayoral Candidate

Is Trump planning on delaying the 2026 Election?